Trivium

At this point, now that we are really moving forward by looking back, I have begun the process of inserting labels on earlier posts* and Trivium is a recent word I learned and my first application is NO JOKE. Quadrivium is a later joke. But I assure this is no joke, and in fact pertinent to our course and our corrections.

*[Minor editing as in punctuation are also being done in this process of assigning labels and putting titles to their proper place.]

At what point is

the Scalia of Justice?*

Rhetorical trivium or grammar of logic?***
(Declaration of Properties ?)**

*foundations @ PoliticsNation 
**dig at site
*** "Society's interest" irony of labels
[found Youtube 1st Link @"Scalia"]
[Scalia Iron Knee?]

[When did absolutism become a label or banner that some don't know they are under?]

Absolut(ist)ly...

in fair & balanced clothing.

Having actually read the first link twice, while it has useful comparisons that demonstrate the divide**, it holds an absolutist view that it is a win or lose for virtue as well as freedom. 

Speaking of a three-legged stool pidgin [!*] (...)
it is more about the balance and geometry. 
(not to mention Ctrl F)

* Sarcasm mark[!] & Mitt-Flop of Un-Reads under pidgin stool.
** : one leg Virtue v. two leg Freedom.
[The Emperor has 1/3 his trivium.]

[Final anachronism or*** Iron Knee ?]
*** Re:googleLabel. (i.e. a google of Secular Theo Libs and our regards.)
(FP0)
3-29-13 (FP1)

Use of Labels

This is just a note that labels are not always useful.
[liberals, conservatives, progressives, neo-cons, communists, fascists]
However, LABELS as they are used below, may be helpful. The previous post includes the addition of the "label" ESCALATION but could be used for almost anything the administration does. At this time it places a focus on world powers and how they get along. The Geometry of Purpose? label refers basically to a structure of how to get things done. For example; focusing on one's own intentions from the grass roots up, not trickle down. Hence the Power Broker Mountain Project. This post is to explain some of the workings of this writer.

Trivium, for example represent the basic medieval course work at universities: grammar, logic and rhetoric. You can see where I am coming from and where we are going. Quadrivium is the upper division of the liberal arts composed of; arithmetic, geometry, astronomy and music.

Example of their use: Fuzzy Math and Fuzzy English = 1 heckuva result *

I will add to this post later, but another feature that I have just begun use of, is the search engine for the blog itself.(Just demonstrated click on heckuva) I will be inserting labels on previous posts, and clicking on them below will bring up that label's postings.

Bonus: LINK requires "Hard Work" of reading and more importantly filtering.

* in case more of a hint is needed, sometimes I am a hechuva speller as well.

FOOTNOTES (March 2013) Page Two

3-14-13 {?} A. Trivium B. Case Study (sc) C. Use of Labels , D. NO JOKE {really?}

3-20-13 Curve Balls? : Pythagorean: http://www.nbcnews.com/video/nbc-news/49076540#51197599 (Mitt at C-Pac)  or  Platonic  http://www.nbcnews.com/video/nbc-news/49076540#51043481 (Jeb Bush on Nightly News)
*** (David) http://www.nbcnews.com/video/nbc-news/49076540#50780562 

3-22-13: [Follow-up of sorts (FP2.]
(b.s.)Ge+Oh+Me+Try: In the begining... , b, C, D, E, F(f), G(g), H(h), I(i), J, K, L*(l), M(m), N(n), O(o), P(p).
(b.s.)Tetrahedron: The Tetrahedron Ramble* (sc), B, C, D, E, f-F, G, H, I, j, k, L, m, n.
*Ctrl F(leverage)&(b.s.) (FP3)

Case Study

Headlines under question(marks)!
Some filter so other don't have to?
Please read, as I haven't yet.

CAUTION: Sarcasm warning! Or as "some people" might say "nuance"? Or was that missed metaphors* or hypocrisy or as I noted "equivalence"** as a challenge in this revolving rhetorical not revolutionary world?

* more likely sloppy punctuation, or logic and grammar?
SUBSET OF CAUTION: I make no equivalence, Google found these Trivium, and the punc is likely too heavy metal or irony?

** just posted "saved in draft"

[There are deeper and lighter case studies, but they are under investigation if not pending prosecution.]

[No Teaser but Prophetic? But dig that Newsweek "V" of triumvirates, the deck of emergence is at least missing the "mark"(?) as in Rand(y) Childish Partiers. I used to be overly sceptical(and ahead of the curve) in the area of Mainstream Media, especially more so in print(I won't mention the big 3) but their first initials are N,T & U or is it nuts? But they are just playing to the market yet the fair-E tale is always in the making. All on deck, even if you have a couple(decks) or are missing a few cards, they just might be only the jokers.]

FOOTNOTES (March 2013) [IV?]

3-14-13 ( ... trivium 4A)
FC{!} 3-14-13 Footnotes Unbegun... or Re begining{?}
hecuva : A. Tea Kettle Sports[!], B. , C.  D. , E. F. G.Catch-44 , H.The best laid plans... (sc),  I. 
pass : A.Pass the Trillion. ,B.Accidental update: (sc)  C. GOP Plan to Hurt Economy (sQ*) D.Chart (sc)  E. D or R (sc)
{!}(above)  A.Inconvenient (sc)   B. The Real B. S. of the F. C.  C. Nail Meet F--C---[!]  D. Irony versus Hypocrisy (sc)**
*cheese foil ?(5*v)
** reminder: (sc)= scroll-over click anomoly
(5*v) or 4(for)m or*** $M?
 Mmmm MOW, MOW, Middle C?, Tin Foil Herman , R.S.V.P.

*** A, B, C, D, E(oar 5th Lament ? (C, E, F, G, H, I )

NO JOKE

Last night, David Letterman made fun of the Democrats for not articulating a message or rather having lost to the Bush efforts of articulation. I won’t attempt to retell the joke, but it is sad, if the opinion prevails that the Democrats could not out-articulate Bush.

Looking at the definition of articulate I will probably come up with a joke of my own. There is irony in the definition of articulate. Bush has claimed to be somewhat of a simple man-of-the-people possibly explaining being a man of simple words. Not wanting to re-articulate what the Republican message was, since it was articulate, particularly as in "expressed clearly", I simply counter that the Democrats message was articulated as in "jointed". Some would say disjointed.

Transportation being a big issue locally the metaphor of a bus came to mind. The Republicans may be on a big bus, but the Democrats are on an articulated bus. I really want to be a partisan and suggest a right and wrong but assigning issues to a bus is the problem. The Republican bus may have only one stop so we better want to go there. The Democrat’s bus may have several stops so few want to ride it all the way. Not to forget that even fewer people want to ride a bus. Let alone those that have issues and problems or candidates that differ from state to state. One or two elections that go one way or another do not a mandate or articulate make. Will we make progress in either bus? Maybe sometimes an uphill battle is better than down hill with no brakes.

[Trivium = grammar, logic and rhetoric : 2-10-07]